This week's column for Gulf News looks recent events in the US - notably the Shirley Sherrod fiasco - and explains the lesson this mess holds for those of us focused on foreign policy: expect little from the administration beyond crisis management until after November's elections.
Gordon's latest column from Gulf News (published Wednesday) looks at the ways in which our debate over Afghanistan is beginning to sound more and more like debates over Iraq four or five years ago.
Sad news this evening of the death Monday of Dr. Nasr Hamed Abu Zeid, a professor at Cairo University whose mild deviations from Islamist orthodoxy led to a years of persecution and his eventual exile in Europe.
I had the privilege of interviewing Dr. Nasr for The Washington Times in 1993. The article I wrote after that interview is attached below.
In retrospect, Dr. Nasr's persecution and the Egyptian government's collusion in it were harbingers of the path the country was headed down - a fact that most of us in the Western media did not quite grasp at the time.
I met Dr. Nasr a few more times after that interview - writing a short follow-up piece and quoting him in other articles over the next year. After leaving Egypt in October 1994 I did not see him again, though I am proud of the fact that I worked to get items about his ongoing troubles into CNN International's newscasts during the late 90s.
What I remember most from that first interview at Cairo University was how perplexed he was by what was happening, and his fears about what awaited him. He and his wife were not yet living behind locked doors with round-the-clock armed guards. Exile from Egypt was still several years in the future. But he seemed to know that these things were in the offing, and to be grimly resigned to them. It was left to his wife, Ebtehal, to express anger on behalf of both of them.
The Arab World has lost a great champion of intellectual freedom.
Rights groups eye Egypt's apostasy trial
Prof's marriage, maybe life, at stake
By Gordon Robison, THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published November 4, 1993
CAIRO - In a development that many believe represents a threat to free expression, Egypt's secular court system is scheduled to receive a report today on whether a defendant in a civil suit is an apostate from Islam.
Today's trial session is the latest twist in an unprecedented divorce action brought by an Islamic lawyer who claims that Nasr Abu Zaid, a professor of Arabic at Cairo University, is an apostate.
Since Islamic law forbids marriage between a Muslim woman and a non-Muslim man, the suit demands that the court dissolve Mr. Abu Zaid's marriage to Ebtehal Younis, a professor of French at the university.
At the trial's opening session in June, Mr. Zaid's writings were referred to Al-Azhar, a Cairo-based mosque and university that is one of the Muslim world's most important centers of theology and jurisprudence. The mosque's scholars were asked to determine whether Mr. Abu Zaid has, in fact, abandoned Islamic beliefs.
The case is being watched closely by human rights groups inside and outside Egypt. In a statement this year, the Egyptian Organization for Human Rights said the suit placed Mr. Abu Zaid's life in jeopardy. Islamic Law traditionally prescribes death as the penalty for apostasy.
"Of course I'm afraid for my life," said Mr. Abu Zaid, who began receiving death threats last spring. "I am afraid of this court case."
The trouble began late last year when Mr. Abu Zaid applied for promotion to a full professorship at Cairo University, where he has taught for the past 21 years.
The procedure for such applications is for three scholars to review all of the applicant's published work in the previous five years. Their recommendation is then passed on to a committee of 13 scholars, which is usually guided by the report of the three-person subcommittee.
Mr. Abu Zaid said that two of the people reviewing his work found him "highly deserving" of promotion while the third criticized him on religious grounds. The committee backed the lone dissenter.
"I thought I was in the hands of an academic committee, not a religious committee. Whatever criticism I have made was pointed to human thinking, not sacred texts," he said.
"My whole career is to study Islamic discourse, whether classical or modern," Mr. Abu Zaid said in a recent interview.
In doing so, he said he had sought to draw a distinction between those elements of Islamic tradition, such as the Koran, that are believed by Muslims to be of divine origin and those that represent human exposition of divine revelations.
Denied promotion, in effect, because of the potential controversy surrounding his writings, Mr. Abu Zaid filed suit. He then learned preachers around Cairo were denouncing him as a heretic and an apostate.
Such denunciations are particularly sensitive in Egypt because of last year's assassination of Farag Fouda, a secularist writer who had also been branded an apostate.
Many Egyptian intellectuals have charged that criticism of Mr. Fouda by preachers amounted to an official license for his assassination by religious militants.
In an interview this week, Mr. Abu Zaid, who calls himself "a secular Muslim," said he hoped Al-Azhar would somehow avoid rendering a judgment on his piety."
If Al-Azhar does interfere, I won't take it silently. . . . Maybe a lot of things in my writing should be explained," he said. "There might be misunderstandings, and I have the right to explain this.
"I'm married to a woman I love. She is not merely my wife, She is my colleague."
Mrs. Younis said of the Islamic fundamentalists who filed the divorce suit: "They can go to hell. I will never leave him."